close

Technology

ApparelCamping Gear ReviewsTechnology

Noggin Skull Cap Reviews

snowboard

Trail-tested headgear will protect your melon from every kind of weather imaginable.

When I say I’m a man of many hats, I don’t mean that I’m some multi talented, jack-of-all-trades renaissance guy. Just ask my friends, and coworkers-they’ll happily recite numerous examples to my wide-ranging incompetence.

read more
Back Packs & BagsTechnology

O.P. Sak Odor Proof Barrier Bag Review

maxresdefault
9.5tech score

Information about the O.P. Sak Odor Proof Barrier Bag

Description, year of manufacturer and MSRP: O.P. Sak Odor Proof Barrier bags were manufactured by Watchful Eye Designs in 2004. The barrier bags are a superior zip lock bag, well they are a polyethylene bag with a patented zip-lock type closure. According to the literature supplied with the bags, the O.P. Saks have identical seals to the ALOKSAK bags (also manufactured by Watchful Eye Designs.) What distinguishes these bags is the barrier film applied to the O.P. Saks. According to Linda Kennedy of Watchful Eye Designs, the film applied to the O.P. Saks is not as durable as that applied to the ALOKSAK. Three O.P. SAK Barrier Bags (12.5″ X 15.5″) have suggested retail price of $10.59 US and three O.P. SAK Barrier Bags (9″ X 6″) have suggested retail price of $7.49 US.

Weights and Measurements: No weights are listed on the manufacturer’s website. My weights, as weighed on my Arlec digital kitchen scales are 0.95 oz (27 g) for the 12.5″ x 15.5″ bag and 0.25 oz (7 g) for the 9″ x 6″ bag. The manufacturer’s measurements are 9″ x 6″ (229 mm x 152 mm) and 12.5″ x 15.5″, (318 mm x 394 mm) respectively. My measurements are 9″ x 6″ (229 mm x 152 mm) and 12.5″ x 16″ (318 mm x 407 mm) respectively.

My Experience Using the O.P. Sak Odor Proof Barrier Bag in the Field

Testing Location Overview: The hiking environment of the southwest of Western Australia allows for hiking and backpacking from coastal plains to the forest. Elevation ranges from 0 to 585 meters . Within this region, I hike in different situations from forestry roads to sandy tracks to single-purpose walking trails, to rock hopping, to beach walking to completely off- driving through an open and dense country.

Weather Conditions: During the summer period, daytime temperatures average 30 C (86F), whereas from March through to December the daytime average temperatures range from 15C to 26C (59F to 79F). During the autumn, winter, & spring periods the typical weather model is relatively wet with frequent heavy rainstorms evident.

According to The Times Atlas of the World, our weather is described as being “Mediterranean – rainy climates with mild winters, coolest month above 0C (32 F), but below 18C (64 F); warmest month above 10 C (50 F).” The atlas depicts the seaside area north of Los Angeles as having the same climate.

Field experience:

Since posting my Initial Report on March 2004, I have used the O.P. Saks on two-weekend bush walks, numerous day walks and as food storage bags between walks. The two-weekend bush walks have seen me camping at Long Point and Swamp Oak campsites, both on the Bibbulmun Track and both known for rodent visitors. The campsites provided me with an opportunity to leave rubbish in the O.P. Saks which were exposed overnight to see if any residents found the contents of interest. In summary, I have not experienced any attacks on the substance. That said, my experience with the Saks has been variable, and this is discussed in the context of the manufacturer’s claims below. Watchful Eye Designs make four specific claims in respect of the O. P. Saks. They are:

That the bags are liquid & air tight. The bags are certified 100% leak proof to 200′ (61 m) under water or 300′ (67 m) depending on what literature is referred to;

  1. that the bags are durable and safe;
  2. fully recyclable;
  3. soft-sided; quiet and shatterproof.

My experience in respect of these claims is outlined below:

Claim 1: That the bags are liquid and air tight. The bags are certified 100% leak proof to 200′ (61 m) under water or 300′ (67 m) depending on what literature is referred to.

First and foremost as outlined in my Initial Report, for this claim to be valid, the O.P. Saks need to be sealed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, i.e., a small amount of air has to be trapped inside the bag, and the zipper completely sealed ensuring no kinks or bends in the seal.

My initial at home testing in the sink quickly proved the importance of following these instructions! It seems, based on my experience, that leaving that small amount of air trapped inside the Sak is important. Similarly, based on my knowledge on the weekend bushwalk to Long Point campsite it is important to not only seal the Sak correctly but also to be reasonable regarding the amount material placed in the bag.

On that walk, on a Friday night I had filled one large Sak with various food items and had sealed the bag I believe by the instructions. However, upon arriving at the Long Point campsite and unpacking my pack, I found that the Sak had burst open at the seal.

No damage to the Sak was evident. I can only put this down to one of three things: (a) incorrectly sealed by me; (b) overfilled or (c) the Sak did not seal as per the manufacturer’s claims. I suspect the cause of the problem was that I overfilled the Sak as I have since taken care to no more than 3/4 fill the Saks and have not managed a repeated burst.

My second test with the O.P. Saks has been to place some food rubbish in them and then leave them “outside” overnight at both the Long Point and Swamp Oak campsites. Experience has shown that Bibbulmun Track campsites have become known to the local native rodent population as well stocked supermarkets. Both campsite registers also indicated recent rodent activity.

I am pleased to report that on both occasions, upon checking on the following morning I was not able to ascertain any evidence of rodent interest. That said, it should be noted that no human residents of the huts reported any rodent activity either, which doesn’t mean there wasn’t any, but this may have been the case.

My third test of the O.P. Sak’s claim of being air tight has been too full one Sak with freshly purchased nuts and one Sak with an opened packet of water crackers. Both Saks were filled in March and have had their contents consumed over the field test period. In fact, the Sak containing the nuts has been refilled on occasion as it has been used as my trail Scroggin. My experience has been that the Saks have been very effective at keeping both the nuts and crackers fresh, suggesting a good air tight seal as claimed.

In summary, overall I am happy with the performance of the O.P. Sak’s air tight seals to date.

Claim 2: That the bags are durable and safe.

In respect of the “safe” claim, I can’t comment as I am not qualified nor am I am undertaking tests to ascertain whether any leeching or other harmful effects are taking place. That said, I have stored food in the Saks, and I have consumed food stored in the Saks and I have not experienced any known adverse effects at this point.

Durability is another matter. I took the claim of durability as implying that the Saks would be ok to fill with food and store directly in my backpack or day pack as desired. It seems, in light of the further comment by Watchful Eye Designs, that my idea of durability may not be correct. It appears that while the Saks may not need treating with “kid gloves” some “reasonable care” is required. I have now moved to using my Saks inside a nylon stuff sack with the intention of providing some protection from the rough and tumble of life inside my packs.

After using the supplied Saks over the Field test period of two months, I have one large Sak which I find hard to seal and this same large Sak and one small Sak showing great signs of wear including holes. I no longer consider either Sak functional as designed.

While I accept that these are “plastic” bags, the manufacturer has made claims of durability. I may have interpreted those claims unreasonably; however, I would suggest that Watchful Eye Designs more clearly spells out its claims of sustainability and considers providing care and use instructions.

I have also exposed the large Sak which is no longer okay to use to the washing machine as the bag is claimed to be “reusable” and throwing it in the wash seemed a good way to clean it. Maybe that was not a good idea! Again, clear care instructions would be beneficial in my opinion.

For the remainder of the testing, I intend to enclose any Saks used in my packs inside nylon stuff sacks to reduce the risk of damage.

Claim 3: Fully recyclable.

I inadvertently made a misleading statement in the Initial Report on the issue of recyclability. The large O. P. Saks do have a recycling symbol on them which is contrary to my original comments. The small Saks, however, lack the recycling symbol. The recycling code on the fat Saks is Four (4). Unfortunately, my local council’s recycling program will only accept plastics coded One (1) and Two (2), so the damaged or unusable Saks are destined for the rubbish.

Claim 4: Soft-sided; quiet and shatterproof.

Well that the bags are soft-sided, they are as quiet in my view as are other “plastic” bags when crunched and I have not shattered one as yet, so I guess at this point these claims are sustained.

Concluding comments:

Overall I am happy with my experience with the Watchful Eye Designs O. P. Saks. That said I am less than fascinated with their durability but will be taking greater care for the remainder of the test. I do like these Saks, and I am impressed with the evidence I have to date of their abilities against rodents. Something I find particularly useful!

 

read more
Camping Gear ReviewsCold Steel Inc.GEARKnivesTechnology

Cold Steel’s Frontier Hawk Review

maxresdefault
8.2tech score

Suitable for re-enactors from any period stretching from the French and Indian War clear up to the final settling of the West in the late 1800’s. The authentic, good looking Frontier Hawk is one tough customer you’re sure to appreciate.

Comes standard with 19 inch (43 centimeters), and a drop forged, medium carbon 5150 steel head. The head is differentially heat treated. This means that the cutting edge is fully hardened, while the balance of the head is left relatively soft to absorb the shock of striking blows. Photos are available on Cold Steel’s Website.

Cold Steel’s sales pitch includes such colorful language as, “Conjuring up images of the American frontier from the French and Indian Wars to the setting of the West”, “modeled after a classic”, and “authentic and effective”. Consulting several histories on the subject reveals that this is all marketing hype. The history of the tomahawk is the history of an iron tool introduced to stone age people. The term ‘tomahawk’ is taken from the Iroquois word that described a similar native stone tool at the time iron trade axes were introduced by settlers. The shape of the head, while efficient, does not resemble any sample of work from the period.

The Frontier Hawk is produced by:

Cold Steel Inc.

Phone: (800)255-4716 or (805)650-8481

Year of Manufacture: 1998?
Materials: Drop Forged medium carbon 5150 Steel,
Straight Grain Hickory Handle
Warranty: Head guaranteed for life. No warranty on handle.
Handle Length: 19 Inches (43 CM)
Head Length: 5.5 Inches (14 CM)
Primary Edge: 3.25 Inches (8 CM)
Listed weight: 20.4 Ounces (.57 KG)
Weight as delivered: 20.7 Ounces
Item #: #90F Frontier Hawk
Listed Retail Price: $29.99
Country of Manufacture: Taiwan

Available Options:

Langetes (#L90BA Retail: $9.99)

Optional Handles:
19″ (43 CM) (#H90RH Retail: $6.49
24″ (61 CM) (#H90T 24″ Handle: $8.49)
30″ (76 CM) (#H90BA 30″ Handle: $12.99)

Buy now $41.99

Impressions & Use:

I originally purchased the Frontier Hawk from Cold Steel after being impressed with other Cold Steel products. The Frontier Hawk was eight ounces (28 grams) lighter than the tomahawk I was using at the time. At first glance, the Frontier Hawk is a small camp hatchet. In practice, it is a very useful tool that is more versatile than a ‘regular’ camp hatchet. The head is easily removed from the handle and works surprisingly well as a skinning and fleshing tool. The ease of head removal also provides the option to leave the handle at home, and to fashion a handle from a stick found on the trail whenever the tool is needed. (I never exercise this option, but it is possible.)

I use the hickory handle, but I have shortened it. The Frontier Hawk is designed and marketed as a weapon, and the 19 inch handle would work well for this purpose, but is too long for general trail work. I shortened my handle to 15 inches (38 centimeters), which is ideal for me. Do not be afraid to experiment with what length is right for you, and to cut the handle once you have discovered this length. If you ruin the handle by cutting it too short, or break the handle, spares are available as indicated above.

In practical use, I find the Frontier Hawk to be superior to other tomahawks I have used. The 5150 steel retains a sharp edge very well, and edge sharpens well with a diamond hone. It is important to keep a sharp edge, because if the edge is allowed to become excessively dull work with files or a grind stone will be necessary, and the 5150 steel is very hard.

The Frontier Hawk’s head is coated with an unspecified kind of black paint. This paint is not durable, and after driving a few stakes with the back of the head, the paint started to flake off. There is little of the paint left after several years of use. This is purely a cosmetic issue, however, and the performance of the tool is not reduced. I have not experienced excessive rusting, although if the tool is not used for a few weeks, a little red dust does appear. Cleaning and oiling the exposed steel eliminates this problem.

The Frontier Hawk comes without sheath or head cover of any kind, which is a little disappointing. I fashioned one simply out of leather. I have carried it in my pack, lashed to the outside, and in ice ax straps when I have worn a pack so equipped. The traditional methods of tucking a tomahawk into your belt, or making a pouch for the specific purpose of carrying it do not work well for me on the trail.

My primary use of the Frontier Hawk is to prepare wood for use in my ZIP stove. (See other reviews on this list.) The Frontier Hawk serves this purpose well, splitting small logs and scraping dry chips with ease. I have used it for hundreds of different tasks, from driving tent stakes to digging cat holes, and from dressing game to use as an improvised ice axe. It has always served me well.

 

THINGS I LIKE:

Light Weight Retains sharp edge well
Very versatile
Lifetime Warranty

THINGS I DON’T LIKE:

No sheath or edge cover provided Paint durability

Thank you for your time.

read more
CasioTechnologyWatch

Casio Alti-Thermo Altimeter watch

item_XL_4832370_1461758
7.6tech score

The Casio Alti-Thermo is a digital watch that includes an altimeter/barometer and a thermometer. It gives present temperature and altitude, displays a recent altitude profile and records as many as fifty altitude+time+date+temperature records. The barometer gives current barometric pressure and displays the last twelve hours’ trend. The Alti-Thermo also has the typical digital watch functions one would find on any fifteen or twenty dollar watch: 12/24-hour time formats, calendar, alarm, stopwatch and display illumination. It’s the altimeter and thermometer features that makes the especially Alti-Thermo hiker-friendly.

read more